Connect with us

News

Rand Paul: President ‘Has Every Right To Withhold Aid’ If He Suspects Corruption

Published

on

Republican Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul said Sunday that President Donald Trump “has every right to withhold aid” to Ukraine if he believed there was significant corruption present in the country.

Paul argued that foreign assistance is never automatic and subject to “contingencies.” The senator would not have offered any aid to Ukraine at all, he told NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

“There are always contingencies on aid. President Obama withheld aid. … I think it’s a mistake to say, ‘oh, he withheld aid until he got what he wanted.’ Well, if there is corruption, he has every right to withhold aid,” Paul said, adding, “If it were me, I wouldn’t give them the aid because we don’t have the money.”

Though a recent Fox News poll indicated that 49% of Americans support impeachment, Paul explained that the most important factor in the impeachment process is the reality or at least the appearances of “fairness” and if Americans perceive that Trump is being treated unfairly by House Democrats.

“I think the American people think it’s unfair to treat Trump to one standard and Joe Biden under a different standard,” he told NBC News. Trump and his allies have accused Joe Biden of having a Ukrainian prosecutor removed from his job so that he would not investigate a natural gas company where he son, Hunter Biden, sat on the board of directors.

Republican South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham has also called the impeachment process unfair and says the Senate should not even proceed with a trial if the House impeaches the president.

Paul said it is impossible to get inside the mind of the president to determine how much he was motivated by his belief that former Vice President Joe Biden was acting improperly in Ukraine. “Foreign aid by law can only go out to countries that are not corrupt so if you think that a country is acting in a corrupt way, the president can always withhold aid until the corruption is fixed.”

The senator said in this context a quid pro quo linking military assistance to Ukraine investigating Biden is unimportant because the president “absolutely does” believe “the Bidens were corrupt.”

Paul said ultimately the impeachment is not being driven by a desire for justice but is nothing more than a power grab. “This ends up being a policy debate and a partisan debate. It has nothing to do with legality or illegality or impeachment. It’s purely a partisan way of trying to overturn the election.”

A version of this story appears on the Daily Caller website.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
3 Comments
  • William says:

    The disgusting truth is that Obama never sent ANY MILITARY AID to the Ukraine, he sent blankets and pillows. And when weapons were release by Trump they went to Poland and were driven into the Ukraine so there would not be any Americans or American aircraft to get shot down in that country. Sieg Heil, Adam Schiff your brainwashing conduct by withholding evidence and manipulating the so called impeachment process makes us look like a Banana Republic as you fuck “Due Process” and the foundation of our judicial system of “Innocent Until Proven Guilty.” You are a fucking moron Mr. Schiff, no wonder your Burbank district is jokingly referred to by Californians as, “The Shit-Hole of the San Fernando Valley,” that is plagued by Drug dealers, prostitutes, homeless and Illegal Aliens…you require the financial support of George Soros and without him you would already be toast.

  • Errol musk says:

    What’s the difference between Biden saying he will withhold funds from Ukraine unless they fire a supposedly ‘bad prosecutor’ (who we know was actually, without any doubt, investigating Biden’s blatantly corrupt son), and President Trump saying to Ukraine he will withhold funds (which he did NOT in fact do) unless they investigate corruption in Ukraine.

    Please help me here. Anyone?

  • Evangeline says:

    The Dems figured they could kill 2 birds with 1 stone. First of all, they’re salivating to impeach Trump. And secondly, they wanted to protect their best candidate, their only hope of possibly beating Trump in 2020 whom Trump was about to expose as a criminal. And the only way would be to say Trump acted corruptly to even have him investigated.

  • RWF
    >